Premarin and Premplus are made by Wyeth, which was later bought out by Pfizer. In a statement issued by Pfizer, the drug company said it would fight the charges and argued there was no way to prove HRT causes breast cancer: “It is widely accepted that science cannot determine what caused or contributed to any individual woman’s breast cancer except in rare circumstances where genetics play a role. Wyeth acted responsibly by conducting or supporting more than 180 studies on hormone therapy’s benefits and risks, and including science-based information in Premarin and Premplus’ labels that accurately communicate these benefits and risks to doctors and patients alike.”

Wyeth strongly promoted HRT as a cure-all for symptoms of menopause that not only treated hot flashes and vaginal dryness, but also offered added benefits such as protection from osteoporosis and heart disease. Any negative press about the drugs was quickly overshadowed by articles promoting the benefits of HRT in medical journals written by ghostwriters paid by Wyeth.

Despite the cover up, the public became aware of the dangers of HRT in 2002, when the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) published a five-year study of menopausal and postmenopausal women that demonstrated that HRT increases the risk for cardiovascular disease and breast cancer.

“I never would have taken Premarin if I had been told of the risks,” said the main plaintiff in the class-action lawsuit, Dianna Stanway of Sechelt, B.C., in a statement issued by her law firm. “I want my lawsuit to help all Canadian women, and their families, who have been harmed by this drug.”

Source: Toronto Sun

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › British Columbia certifies HRT class action lawsuit

Wyeth had heavily promoted its HRT drugs Premarin and Prempro as safe and effective treatments for bothersome symptoms of menopause. The pharmaceutical company even promoted the pills for their added benefit of protecting women against heart disease and dementia. But evidence was beginning to surface that the drugs were actually far more dangerous than the public or doctors ever perceived.

The Women’s Health Initiative (WHI), a research project on the morbidity and mortality of menopausal and post-menopausal women, abruptly halted its study on HRT in 2002 when data showed a significant risk for breast cancer in women who used HRT.

In Singleton v. Wyeth, the jury had awarded $3.45 million in compensatory damages, which the court raised to $4.4 million for delay, and $6 million in punitive damages, according to The American Association for Justice. Judge Mark Bernstein based the punitive award on Wyeth’s deceptive public relations campaign designed to “dismiss and distract” doctors away from concerns about HRT and breast cancer.

The drug company went so far as to fund continuing medical education programs in an attempt to convince physicians that there was no increased risk for breast cancer, and used training materials to imply that the drugs would, in fact, protect women from developing the disease.

There are 15,000 hormone replacement therapy cases pending in lower courts.

Source: The American Association for Justice

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Compensatory and punitive damages awarded in HRT lawsuit

HRT was once heralded as a cure-all for problematic symptoms of menopause, including hot flashes, sleeping difficulties, mood swings and vaginal dryness. It was also given the added benefit of protecting women against heart disease and osteoporosis.

However, opinion quickly changed in 2002, after a large study of postmenopausal women found that HRT that combined the hormones estrogen and progesterone increased a woman’s risk for breast cancer by about one extra case for every 1,000 women who took the hormones for a year. It also showed no evidence of protecting women against cardiac events.

Once word got out, prescriptions for HRT plummeted by half, and cases of breast cancer soon dropped as well. Despite the decrease in HRT use, researchers continued to study women who remained on the drugs. The women in the study were an average age of 63 and remained on HRT for an average of 11 years.

Researchers found that among these women there was not only an increase in the number of breast cancer cases, but the cancers they were diagnosed with were more likely to be advanced and more deadly than previously thought. Data shows an increase of one extra death per year for every 10,000 women.

While HRT use has been drastically cut since 2002, it is still used by many women to curb menopausal symptoms. Researchers say that while the new data shows only a slight increase in breast cancer deaths compared to previous studies, it adds more fuel to the argument against the medication.

Source: CBS

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Study finds HRT breast cancers are more likely to be advanced, deadly

The pill, known as TU-025, combines cinnamon bark, peach pits and several other botanicals, and is regulated as a prescription drug in Japan. It is commonly used by Japanese gynecologists to treat hot flashes in menopausal women. The drug’s maker, Tokyo-based Tsumura & Company, helped fund a study to see if the benefits would also be seen in American women. The consensus was that if it proved beneficial, the herb could offer a safer alternative to traditional hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

For years, it was widely publicized that HRT not only curbed menopausal symptoms but also helped protect women against heart disease and osteoporosis. A study conducted in 2002 found that instead of improving the quality of women’s lives, it was actually putting them at great risk for developing breast cancer. As more and more women are looking for safer alternatives to HRT, the herb-based TU-025 became an attractive notion.

To determine the effectiveness of TU-025, researchers randomly assigned 178 postmenopausal women to take either the herbal pills or a placebo every day for three months. At the end of the study, researchers found that women who took the herb experienced fewer hot flashes, sleep problems and other symptoms associated with menopause.

However, women who took the placebo reported similar improvements. Thus, the “miracle drug” TU-025 will not be marketed in the United States.

Source: Reuters

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Herbal alternative to HRT denied FDA approval

The rejected appeal comes on the heels of a Pfizer report that it had put aside $772 million to settle lawsuits from women who claimed the pills caused them to develop breast cancer.

Prempro is a medication containing estrogen plus progestin. It is often prescribed to treat symptoms of menopause, such as hot flashes, vaginal dryness, mood swings, difficulty sleeping, and decreased sexual desire. Wyeth, which was later bought by Pfizer, had promoted the drugs as safe and claimed they offered women added benefits such as protection against heart disease and dementia.

However, a study as part of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) that looked at the effects of HRT in menopausal and post-menopausal women, was abruptly halted after early data showed HRT put women at risk for breast cancer. Since then, about 10,000 Prempro breast cancer lawsuits have been filed.

A large number of the Prempro trials have resulted in multi-million dollar awards against the drug maker after juries found that the drug company knew that the dangers associated with HRT but actively tried to cover up the risks.

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Supreme Court rejects Prempro breast cancer lawsuit appeal

Hormone replacement therapy was designed to boost hormone levels in menopausal and post-menopausal women and help them deal with symptoms such as irritability, night sweats, hot flashes, vaginal dryness and sleeplessness.

If you asked drug companies – especially 20 years ago when HRT was widely prescribed – they would rattle off a laundry list of extra benefits ranging from prevention of osteoporosis, heart disease, and dementia. But the reality is, HRT can be deadly.

A large study on the effects of HRT on menopausal and post-menopausal women as part of the Women’s Health Initiative was halted in 2001 after data showed that combination HRT put women at risk for breast cancer and other dangerous conditions including heart attacks and strokes.

Now that the serious risks associated HRT have been made public, prescriptions have gone down considerably. Dr. Oz asks Rosemarie if she is having any symptoms, and she says her only problem is trouble sleeping at night. He suggests if she is not experiencing any major problems, that she stay drug free.

For women who feel they cannot cope with their symptoms, Dr. Oz suggests they talk to their doctors about bio-identical hormones. The important thing, he said, is to “take them smartly” because while there are “theoretical advantages” to HRT, there are also serious disadvantages to consider.

Source: Dr. Oz/Fox 11

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Dr. Oz warns post-menopausal guest to stay away from HRT

Mrs. Smith talked to her doctor, who recommended Prempro, a pill made by Wyeth that contains a mixture of estrogen and synthetic progestin hormones. The pills were also marketed to doctors and women as a miracle drug that tamed not only menopausal symptoms but also had the added benefit of protecting women against heart disease and osteoporosis. HRT became widely prescribed, and Wyeth racked in billions in profits.

Less than two years after starting HRT, Mrs. Smith, an otherwise hormone deficient woman, was diagnosed with a hormone-fed breast cancer. She became part of a staggering statistic that was only just beginning to emerge from the Women’s Health Initiative, research that focused on causes of mortality and morbidity in menopausal and post-menopausal women. The study that focused on HRT was abruptly halted in 2002 when data showed that women who used HRT were at greater risk for breast cancer. They were also at increased risk for ovarian cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, heart attacks, strokes and blood clots.

Perhaps even more disturbing is evidence that suggests that Wyeth was aware of the potential for serious health risks associated with its billion-dollar drug, but failed to warn doctors and their patients. As a result, as many as 10,000 women or their family members have filed lawsuits against Wyeth. This August, Mrs. Smith is scheduled to have her day in court.

“We look forward to the trial of this case,” says attorney Ted Meadows with Beasley Allen Law Firm. “Once the jury gets to see the evidence that other juries have seen, we believe they will agree that Prempro caused (Mrs. Smith’s) breast cancer and that doctors were not adequately warned because Wyeth refused to properly test the drug.”

* client’s name has been changed

For more information about HRT litigation, visit www.beasleyallen.com.

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › HRT breast cancer trial set for August

Given the risks associated with hormone replacement therapy (HRT), women should seriously weigh whether the benefits of therapy are worth the potential harm it may cause. Luckily, women today are armed with information to make informed decisions about HRT. This wasn’t always the case.

When HRT was first introduced, the hormones were heavily marketed to doctors and women as a miracle drug that not only tamed menopausal symptoms, but also helped protect women against heart disease and osteoporosis. As a result, Wyeth, makers of the popular HRT drugs Premarin and Prempro, raked in billions of dollars in sales.

But what Wyeth was not telling doctors and their patients is that women who used HRT were putting themselves at greater risk for breast cancer and other serious illnesses. It wasn’t until the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) began to uncover this shocking evidence that the rest of the world became privy to it.

The study, which focused on the causes of mortality and morbidity in menopausal and post-menopausal women, quickly halted an investigation of hormone therapy in 2002 when it found that women who took the drugs were at much greater risk of developing breast cancer. They were also at an increased risk of heart attacks, strokes and blood clots.

Wyeth has settled or has agreed to settle more than 10,000 lawsuits against it from women or their family members who say they were needlessly injured by HRT. The settlements are expected to cost the pharmaceutical company at least $772 million – a far cry from the billions the company earned in sales from the dangerous drug.

Source: MyHealthNewsDaily

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › HRT ‘miracle drug’ not good idea for most women

The popular HRT drugs, including Premarin and Prempro, were marketed by Wyeth Pharmaceuticals as a cure-all for bothersome symptoms of menopause with added benefits such as protecting women against osteoporosis and heart disease. In 2002, a long-term study on women’s health instead found the drugs put women at greater risk for breast cancer and other deadly diseases and conditions including ovarian cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, heart attack, stroke and blood clots.

Thousands of women or their family members filed suit against the drug company alleging that Wyeth was aware of the dangers its HRT but continued to market it to doctors.

Two years ago, Pfizer purchased Wyeth for $67 billion, and inherited its liability. In a recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Pfizer booked a charge of $300 million for the minimum expected costs to resolve all of the remaining cases against the company. The company said with the uncertainties involved with product liability litigation, Pfizer may be required to pay even more.

Pfizer won’t say how many cases are left to settle, though some estimates put the number at more than 3,000.

Sources:
Wall Street Journal
The Day

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Pfizer to pay out at least $300 million to settle remaining HRT lawsuits

The landmark government research studied 24,000 postmenopausal women taking either HRT or placebo, and found that women on HRT were 21 percent more likely to develop kidney stones over a five-year period. The risks were equal among women taking Prempro, pills containing estrogen plus progestin, and Premarin, estrogen-only pills. Comparatively, studies show that overall about 6 percent of postmenopausal women develop kidney stones.

It is yet more bad news for women who for years had been fooled by false advertising from pharmaceutical companies that promised the pills not only relieved annoying symptoms of menopause, including hot flashes and mood swings, but also protected them against cancer, heart disease and osteoporosis. However, a major study into the mortality and morbidity of postmenopausal women was abruptly halted in 2002 when data indicated that women who used HRT were at substantially greater risk of developing breast cancer.

As the data was more closely studied, evidence surfaced that HRT also didn’t protect women against heart disease, and in fact, put them at greater risk or heart attacks and strokes. It was also found to increase a women’s risk for dementia and increase the death rate among women with lung cancer.

Kidney stones are hard crystals of calcium or other substances that separate from liquid in urine. The stones usually pass without treatment, but even the smallest stones can cause excruciating pain until they break up or exit the body. Stones too large to pass are often treated with noninvasive shock wave therapy or surgery.

Researchers say are uncertain why HRT increases a woman’s risk though one explanation may be that the pills can cause an increase in uric acid which may contribute to the formation of kidney stones.

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › New study finds HRT increases women’s risk for kidney stones

The level of risk seemed to increase with the duration of therapy. Women who took combined therapy for 10 years or more were at the greatest risk for lung cancer. The study also indicated that the risk was limited to the combined therapy as opposed to the estrogen-only HRT. Smoking also didn’t affect the influence of HRT on lung cancer risk.

“Although HRT use has declined and is not recommended except for short-term treatment of menopausal symptoms, our results indicate millions of women remain at risk of developing lung cancer,” Christopher G. Slatore, MD, of Oregon Health and Sciences University in Portland, and colleagues wrote.

The study involved data from a prospective cohort of 36,588 peri- and postmenopausal women ages 50 to 76 who had participated in the Vitamins and Lifestyles (VITAL) study that examined associations between use of supplements and cancer risk. Two-thirds of the study’s participants either took or had taken HRT. A similar number had a family history of lung cancer, and another two-thirds smoked.

During the six years of follow-up in the study, 344 women, including some from both the HRT and the non-HRT group, developed lung cancer. The study showed that women who took combined HRT for nine years or less had a 1.27 risk for lung caner, something not considered statistically significant. However, women who took the combined therapy for 10 years or longer had a 1.48 hazard ratio for lung cancer, considered a much more notable increase.

“These findings may be helpful for informing women of their risk of developing lung cancer and delineating important pathways involved in hormone metabolism and lung cancer,” the authors wrote in conclusion.

Source: MedPage Today

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Study: HRT puts women at greater risk for lung cancer

Yet, Wyeth kept providing to medical journals more ghostwritten articles by doctors on topics that supported the benefits of HRT. It wasn’t until a study as part of the massive Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) showed that the drugs to treat menopause symptoms were actually putting women at higher risk for breast cancer and heart disease that the public took notice.

By then, Wyeth had made billions on its HRT drugs Premarin and Prempro. Thousands of women have taken Wyeth to court demanding justice. But what about the articles in archived medical journals? Martha Rosenberg, a columnist featured in OpEdNews says the articles should be retracted. “Plagiarism, ‘unethical research’ and unreliable findings from ‘fabricated data’ are grounds for retraction of medical journal articles according to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE),” she writes. “But one look at the US National Library of Medicine database reveals that bogus, ghostwritten papers Wyeth planted in medical journals in a scandal which reached the U.S. Congress last year still stand, unretracted.

“Hormone therapy represents one of the largest swaths of preventable injuries to healthy citizens in recent history with thousands of women developing cancer and other deadly side effects. Yet Wyeth/Pfizer maintains it doesn’t know how the idea that hormone therapy could prevent heart disease and dementia and provide other ‘benefits’ ever got started.”

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Ghostwritten medical journal articles about HRT should be retracted

Asthma is more common in young women after they begin having periods, and hospitalizations due to asthma is higher among women than men. The severity of asthma also varies during a woman’s menstrual cycle and when she is pregnant. But studies show that asthma generally wanes after menopause.

Estrogen-only HRT has already been linked to uterine cancer in women who still had their uteruses, but the combined therapy was deemed safer for women who had not undergone a hysterectomy. Once thought to be a cure-all for not only menopausal symptoms but also for cancer and heart disease, the estrogen-plus-progestin HRT became a billion-dollar industry in the late 20th Century. But in 2002, a large-scale federal study found that women who took the combined HRT were at greater risk of breast cancer and heart disease. Since 2002, HRT use among women has dropped significantly.

Source: Reuters

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Estrogen-only HRT linked to asthma after menopause

As we all know, numerous studies later showed that HRT did far from make women healthier. It increased their risk of breast cancer and heart disease. Despite the studies, some doctors continue to prescribe hormone therapy to their patients battling symptoms of menopause. Is it a wrong decision?

Dr. James Dilliard, who writes a column for the East Hampton Star, says not necessarily. Choosing to take HRT should be a thoughtful decision that women should make only after discussing their risks with their doctors.

The difference between now and 10 or 20 years ago, when HRT drugs were being heavily advertised, is that women and their doctors are now armed with the research to help them make more informed decisions.

“The right answer is that you have discussed with your doctor all the risks and benefits of hormone replacement in light of all the research and relative to your health status, risks, and family history,” Dr. Dillard says, “and that together you have agreed that it is worth the risks, for you.”

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Research helps women make more informed decisions about HRT

The study published this week in the Epidemiology journal refutes the notion that a family history contributes to the carcinogenic effects of estrogen.

“Although we know that family history is a risk factor, we don’t know yet what it is about family history that conveys the risk,” said Robert E. Gramling, M.D., D.Sc., assistant professor of Family Medicine and of Community and Preventive Medicine at URMC. “Some have proposed that it might be an increased sensitivity to estrogen, but our data did not support that notion. In fact, this study suggests the causal pathway based on family history is probably not estrogen sensitivity.”

Family history is identified as a “first-degree family history,” involving breast cancer in a mother, sister or daughter. Both family history and estrogen therapy have independently been identified as a risk factor for postmenopausal women. The Rochester study focused on whether the two risk factors together increased a woman’s risk.

Researchers used data from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trial, which followed 16,608 premenopausal women who took HRT or a placebo pill between 1993 and 2002. The study was halted after data began to show that HRT greatly increased a woman’s risk of breast cancer, heart disease and other serious illness.

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › HRT-breast cancer risk same regardless of family history

Iowa Sen. Charles E. Grassley, a member of the Senate Finance Committee, is leading the investigation into the drug industry’s influence on doctors. As part of the investigation, Sen. Grassley has sent letters to Wyeth and DesignWrite, a medical writing company, asking for details on scientific reports that were prepared by DesignWrite for Wyeth and to describe the authors’ extent of involvement and any fees paid.

“Any attempt to manipulate the scientific literature, that can in turn mislead doctors to prescribe drugs that may not work and/or cause harm to their patients, is very troubling,” Sen. Grassley wrote to Wyeth’s chairman and chief executive, Bernard J. Poussot, according to the New York Times story.

Prempro was one of the more widely used hormone replacement therapies prescribed for women to combat symptoms of menopause, such as hot flashes, night sweats, mood swings and decreased sexual desire. It was thought that hormones had an added benefit – that taking HRT reduced a woman’s chance of breast cancer and heart disease. However, the Women’s Health Initiative in 2002 found that taking HRT measurably increased a woman’s risk for serious conditions including breast cancer, ovarian cancer and heart disease. Since then, Wyeth has faced numerous lawsuits claiming the drug company misled the public about the safety of its hormone therapy.

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Study finds Wyeth paid ghostwriters to promote Prempro

Years ago, HRT was the method-of-choice for most women to combat annoying menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes, moodiness, night sweats and decreased sexual desire. The therapy also was thought to offer other benefits, such as a lowered risk of heart disease and breast cancer.

However, the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) of 2002 changed popular opinion when it found that HRT greatly increased a woman’s risk of breast cancer, heart disease and other serious illnesses. Since then, HRT and its effects have continued to be a closely studied therapy.

University of California-Irvine senior statistician, Sarah F. Marshall, presented the findings of her study at the San Antonio (Texas) Breast Cancer Symposium. The study followed 2,800 postmenopausal women who developed breast cancer beginning in 1995 until their deaths or through the end of 2005.

It found that women who took HRT before they were diagnosed with cancer were more likely to be diagnosed with estrogen receptor-positive cancer, and that the cancer was smaller and detected at an earlier stage. Marshall says that this type of cancer – estrogen receptor-positive cancer – is easier to treat and as a result, women have a lower risk of dying.

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Estrogen receptor-positive cancer easier to treat, study says

Most doctors prescribed HRT for women experiencing bothersome symptoms of menopause such as hot flashes and night sweats, mood swings and decreased sexual desire. Just a few years ago it was believed that long-term use of HRT was safe and offered other benefits, such as protecting against osteoporosis and heart disease.

However, preliminary results of the 2002 Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) showed that the complications of HRT far outweighed the benefits. WHI researchers found that women on hormones were at an even higher risk for serious diseases and conditions such as breast cancer, ovarian cancer, cardiovascular disease, stroke and blood clots.

The new study is the first follow up to the landmark WHI. The analysis focused on women’s health three years after stopping HRT. Researchers have found that women who stopped HRT still had an increased risk of cancer – especially breast and lung cancers. The report also found a decreased risk of heart disease.

During the second and third years after the end of WHI, researchers noticed that women who took hormones but stopped were 24 percent more likely to develop cancer than women who had taken placebos during WHI.

Researchers say the analysis results show that women who have stopped taking hormones need to be vigilant about getting cancer screenings and mammograms.

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Cancer risk still elevated even years after stopping HRT

Hot flashes and night sweats are a common symptom of menopause in most women. While the cause is unknown, researchers believe those symptoms are due to changing levels of estrogen on the temperature regulation centers of the brain. According to the report, when estrogen levels drop during menopause, it triggers the body to release heat, making the woman experience a hot flash. Since body fat is insulating, researchers believe that women with more body fat may have a hard time dissipating body heat when hot flashes occur. Thus, the hot flashes tend to last longer.

Overweight women also tend to have higher circulation levels of estrogen, which was initially thought to reduce the impact of hot flashes. Higher estrogen circulation can help reduce the risk of osteoporosis, but also can increase a woman’s risk of breast and uterine cancers.

Because menopausal symptoms can become bothersome, many women turn to hormone replacement therapy (HRT). HRT was a common treatment for menopausal symptoms however more women are opting to go without or seek alternatives to HRT after the Women’s Health Initiative of 2002 showed that HRT increased a women’s risk of serious health conditions such as breast cancer and heart disease.

Some studies suggest that exercise may help alleviate some symptoms of menopause, such as hot flashes and night sweats. Considering the study recently published in the American Journal of Epidemiology, perhaps reducing body fat can also reduce the duration of hot flashes.

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Heavier women suffer more hot flashes, study suggests

The usual symptoms of a heart attack are what he describes as a “crushing chest pain radiating to the arm and/or jaw.” The symptoms often are associated with shortness of breath and sweating. However, he warns, those “typical” symptoms are not so common in women, with as many as 40 percent of women reporting that they never even experienced chest pain during a heart attack, also known as a myocardial infraction, or MI.

Dr. Hersh explains that women most often have “prodromal symptoms,” or symptoms for up to a month before having a heart attack. The warning symptoms include unusual fatigue, sleep disturbances, shortness of breath, a feeling of indigestion, and anxiety. During an MI, women often experience symptoms such as a hot or burning sensation in their back (above the waist), shoulders, arms or lower jaw that is often sensitive to the touch. Other unusual symptoms include shortness of breath; overwhelming fatigue; severe nausea or vomiting; dizziness or fainting; weakness in the arms; a sudden feeling of anxiety, panic or impending doom; and occasionally chest pain and other “typical” symptoms.

Menopause, on the other hand, carries symptoms such as hot flashes that typically start in the face and chest and then become generalized; sleep disturbances, which are often due to the hot flashes; and fatigue and depression. The common symptoms, Dr. Hersh points out, often are played out differently. For example, hot flashes that start all over the face and become generalized may be more likely to be due to menopause as opposed to a hot sensation in the lower jaw.

Heart disease is the No. 1 cause of death in women, so women with any concerning symptoms should address them with their doctor. And if you experience symptoms of an MI, call 911 or go directly to the emergency room. Early treatment can save your life.

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Menopause, heart attack symptoms sometimes can be similar

The link was discovered during the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI), a major 15-year research program launched in 1991 to address the most common causes of death, disability and poor quality of life in postmenopausal women – cardiovascular disease, cancer and osteoporosis. The study was halted prematurely because participants on HRT exceeded the boundary for breast cancer risk that was established at the beginning of the study. There also was an increased risk for heart disease for patients on HRT compared to those who were not.

But a new report published online Tuesday in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute found that cases of breast cancer had fallen 2.2 percent between 1999 and 2002, several years before hormone replacement therapy became an issue, meaning other factors may be involved, according to the Houston Chronicle.

Overall, the report pointed to a first-time drop in the cancer rates among both men and women, according to the story. It also showed a dramatic drop in the 15-year decline in cancer death rates, meaning people diagnosed with cancer are living longer. Researchers credit aggressive cancer prevention and treatment efforts for the successes in the fight against the country’s No. 2 killer.

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Report cites drop in cancer rates among men and women

The research revealed that women with no existing heart conditions who took HRT experienced negative heart health effects, including inflammation which can be related to heart disease.

The study was prompted by researchers who wanted to know the validity of the so-called six-week timing hypothesis, a theory which came about following the Women’s Health Initiative which linked the use of HRT to an increased risk of heart disease and other serious diseases and conditions. The timing hypothesis suggests that if a woman begins HRT within six years of her final menstrual period, the drugs could keep heart disease from developing at the onset of menopause.

While the six-week window found HRT showed beneficial changes in HDL and LDL cholesterol levels, the risk of heart disease was still a viable threat, according to researchers. Thus, women are encouraged to discuss their options with their doctors in order to make a decision they are comfortable with.

Heart disease risk can be measured with lipid panels and by measuring inflammation markers. These tests typically are not conducted as part of an office visit for women considering hormone replacement therapy.

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Researchers find HRT can have negative effect on heart health

According to the report, Kings College London researchers tracked 442 female breast cancer survivors for more than four years, half of which had been given HRT. The women who were taking HRT had a 14 percent higher recurrence rate than those who did not take HRT.

All women tracked participated in the 2002 U.S. government-sponsored Women’s Health Initiative, which studied the effects of HRT on women. That study was halted after researchers found that HRT led to an increased risk of dangerous medical conditions such as breast cancer, heart attack, stroke and blood clots.

In a related commentary in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Dr. Kathy Prichard of Canada’s Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, indicated that the data is convincing. “It seems that the harmful side effects of HRT (in breast cancer survivors) have finally been clearly demonstrated in what is, by today’s standards, a small randomized trial, carried out in a few relatively small countries,” Dr. Pritchard wrote.

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › HRT linked to recurrence of breast cancer

For six years, Danish researchers tracked nearly 700,000 healthy Danish women aged 51 to 69. While researchers found no increased risk of a heart attack in women who were currently using HRT compared with women who had never used HRT, there was a 24 percent increased risk among women aged 51 to 54, and an increased risk in women of the same age group taking the prescribed medications for a long period of time.

The study found that older women taking HRT over the long term did not have an increased risk of heart attack; however there was an increased risk among these women with estrogen alone.

The Danish study is the largest of its kind since the 2002 U.S. government-sponsored Women’s Health Initiative (WHI), that was halted when researchers found that HRT led to an increased risk of dangerous conditions such as breast cancer, heart attack, stroke and blood clots. A woman’s risk depended on whether she was taking estrogen alone or estrogen plus progesterone. The findings disputed the prior belief that HRT could reduce a woman’s risk of heart disease.

The Danish study points out numerous factors that impact the pros and cons of HRT, including the amount of hormone taken and the timing of use.

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › Timing, method of HRT may affect heart attack risk

For years, HRT was considered the cure-all for menopausal symptoms that range from hot flashes and riding the emotional roller coaster to bone loss and osteoporosis. But a 2002 study by the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) and funded by the National Institutes of Health stopped women and their doctors in their tracks when the research revealed that the risks of HRT far outweighed and outnumbered the benefits. The WHI report stated that long-term use of estrogen/progestin therapy led to a 26 percent increase in breast cancer, not to mention a laundry list of other serious side effects.

The American Cancer Society suggests women talk with their own doctors before deciding whether HRT is right for them. The organization also suggested women heed the advice of the WHI, which includes not continuing or starting HRT to prevent heart disease; to discuss their risk of heart attack, stroke, blood clots and breast cancer before taking HRT for osteoporosis prevention; and to perform regular breast self-exams and schedule annual mammograms.

Using HRT for the short-term may be a safer alternative, the report states, however, “Given these results, we recommend that clinicians stop prescribing this combination for long term use. ‘Primum non nocere’ [First, do no harm] applies especially to preventive health care.”

SOURCE: Hormone Replacement Therapy › October is breast cancer month; time to evaluate breast health